Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro versus KTM 1290 Super Adventure S
Triumph Tiger 1200 GT Pro
KTM 1290 Super Adventure S
Year of construction / RRP / Test report
Competitors
- Beefy engine
- Plenty of space for rider & pillion passenger
- Complete equipment
- Semi-active chassis
- Long-distance seating position
- plenty of power
- lavish furnishings
- good usability
- good travel comfort for driver and pillion passenger
- successful deitails
- plenty of accessories available
- slight load change reactions
- high, but not unusual price in this class
- somewhat idiosyncratic front mask (a matter of taste)
- for some maybe a bit overloaded with technology
Dimensions & Weight
Length : 2.230 mm Height : 1.436 mm
Seat : 850 mm until : 870 mm
Weight : 245 kg
Length : 2.250 mm Height : 1.520 mm
Seat : 849 mm until : 869 mm
Weight : 243 (max: 460 ) kg
Engine
Displacement: 1.160 ccm
Hub: 61 mm
Hole: 90 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kardan
Aisles: 6
Displacement: 1.301 ccm
Hub: 71 mm
Hole: 108 mm
Cooling: flüssig
Drive: Kette
Aisles: 6
Performance
Performance: 150 HP at 9.000 U/Min
Torque: 130 NM bei 7.000 U/Min Tank contents: 20 Litre
Consumption: 6 l
Reach: 350 km
Performance: 160 HP at 9.000 U/Min
Torque: 138 NM bei 6.750 U/Min Tank contents: 23 Litre
Consumption: 6 l
Reach: 404 km
Chassis
Tubular space frameTubular steel frame with forged aluminium booms. Screwed aluminium rear frame. (Steel) Front suspension:
Showa 49 mm upside-down front fork with semi-active damping. (travel 200 mm) Rear suspension:
Showa central strut with semi-active damping and automatic electronic preload adjustment. (travel 200 mm)
Rear suspension:
"Tri-Link" two-arm aluminum swingarm with two aluminum torque supports. Tyres at the front: 120/70R19
Rear tyres: 150/70R18
Lattice tube (chromium-molybdenum) Front suspension:
Semi-active WP-USD fork Ø 48 mm (travel 200 mm) Rear suspension:
Semi-active WP Monoshock strut (travel 200 mm)
Rear suspension:
Die-cast two-arm swingarm Tyres at the front: 120/70 ZR19
Rear tyres: 170/60 ZR17
Brakes
Double disc, Brembo M4.30 Stylema monobloc calipers (∅ 320 mm) Rear brake
Single disc, Brembo single piston caliper (∅ 282 mm)
Double disc Brembo four-piston radial fixed caliper (∅ 320 mm) Rear brake
Brembo two-piston fixed caliper (∅ 267 mm)
bei Modules__MT_BikeVergleich._Closure$__._Lambda$__44-0(XElement p1) in D:\CMS_2015\motorradtest2020\www215dll-MT-live\Modules\_MT-BikeVergleich\BikeVergleich.ascx.vb:Zeile 444.bei System.Linq.Enumerable.WhereEnumerableIterator`1.MoveNext()bei System.Linq.Enumerable.LastOrDefault[TSource](IEnumerable`1 source)bei Modules__MT_BikeVergleich.GetFazitHtml() in D:\CMS_2015\motorradtest2020\www215dll-MT-live\Modules\_MT-BikeVergleich\BikeVergleich.ascx.vb:Zeile 443.
Conclusion - what gets stuck
Well, bad motorcycles aren't actually built in this class any more. So what remains to be said? You have to look for the mistakes with a magnifying glass. But of course we have done this too and therefore mention the following criticisms: The compartment for the mobile phone is unfortunately too small for many models. From the point of view of a travel machine, a gimbal would also be nice – but clearly it's just KTM.
The optics of the front mask in particular are not for everyone – but this really falls under the category of taste question. The purchase price is quite lavish, but even with that the KTM is not alone. So let's return to the entry question of whether the KTM 1290 Super Adventure S is the new benchmark. The new benchmark is perhaps very ambitious. But the KTM can keep up with the big competing machines from this segment. And you almost get the impression that the differences are getting smaller and smaller.
The test machine was provided to us by Motorrad Ruser.
